SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J.
Raisen Marketing Pvt. Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9745 of 2022 and CM Appl. 28912 of 2022
Decided On : 04-07-2022




The court approved the temporary de-sealing of premises for stock movement, emphasizing compliance with administrative permits and the role of regulatory authorities.

Headnote:(A) Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 343 and 344(1) - Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for temporary de-sealing of property to allow shifting of liquor stock - Petitioner sought relief due to sealing of premises following amalgamation - Respondents approved temporary de-sealing on 05.05.2022 for 18.05.2022, but objections regarding Excise Department's permission delayed stock transfer - Court directed temporary de-sealing for 07.07.2022, to facilitate shifting of stock. (Paras 1-8)

(B) Judicial review - The power of judicial review is limited to ensuring legality and adherence to procedural requirements without interfering with merit except in cases of lack of jurisdiction or violation of principles of natural justice. (Para 6)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, Rauisen Marketing Pvt. Ltd., applied for temporary de-sealing of its property to shift stock post-sealing due to alleged amalgamation of shops. The liquor vend's operation faced challenges due to a lack of Excise permission for stock movement on the designated day.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the temporary de-sealing request based on the approval from the respondents, reaffirming the efficacy of administrative directions.

Issues: The primary issue was the handling of the petitioner's request for temporary de-sealing and compliance with regulatory permissions from the Excise Department.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the authority of administrative bodies in granting temporary de-sealing while ensuring compliance with existing laws. It noted the requirement of Excise Department permission for stock transfer.

Result: Petition disposed of; directions for temporary de-sealing granted.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks temporary de-sealing for stock removal. (Para 1)
2. petitioner describes liquor license and sealing background. (Para 2 , 3)
3. respondents acknowledged temporary de-sealing approval. (Para 4 , 5)
4. petitioner seeking confirmation of necessary permissions. (Para 6 , 7)
5. court orders temporary de-sealing and concludes petition. (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (ORAL)

1. By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has sought the following reliefs:

"a. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow temporary de-sealing of the property bearing Shop No. 29, Block-B, Shop No. B-45, 44A, Block A, Ground Floor, LSC Market, Naraina, New Delhi - 110015 for a period of Seven (7) days allowing the petitioner to shift/remove its existing stock to Plot No. 30, GF & Mezzanine Floor, Commercial Complex Naraina Industrial Area, Phase -I, New Delhi - 110028 for which excise permission has been granted vide Order dated 20.05.2022 passed by the Department of Excise, Govt. of NCT of Delhi;

b. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to remove its stock stored at the property bearing Shop No. 29, Block-B, Shop No. B-45, 44A, Block A, Ground Floor, LSC Market, Naraina, New Delhi - 110015 from the said property;

c. Pass a writ of Mandamus or a similar direction against the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to carry out the necessary construction in the property bearing Shop No. 29, Block-B, Shop No. B-45, 44A, Block A, Ground Floor, LSC Market, Naraina, New Delhi - 110015 to rectify the amalgamation carried out pursuant to which the said property was sealed."

2. Mr. Ramesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was granted L-7Z Zonal licence for Retail sale of Indian and foreign liquor (excluding country liquor) in the NCT of Delhi on 18.08.2021, which was valid upto 31.03.2022. Thereafter, on 18.11.2021, it obtained an L-7V license to operate liquor vend from Shop Nos. 44(A), B-45(B), Ground Floor, Block A and Shop No. 29, Ground Floor, Block B, L.S.C., Naraina, New Delhi, which stands extended till 31.07.2022.

During the course of operation of its liquor vend, the petitioner received a Show Cause Notice dated 24.11.2021 from the respondents under Sections 343 and 344(1) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, alleging amalgamation of the Shops bearing Nos. A-29(A), B-44(A) and B-45(B), LSC Market by removal of the partition walls at the ground floor. Subsequently, the said properties were sealed on 03.12.2021 and also partly demolished.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that vide order dated 20.05.2022, the Deputy Commissioner (Excise-I)/Licensing Authority has approved the petitioner's request for shifting of stock from Shop No. 29, Block-B, B-45 Block-A, Shop No. 44A, Ground Floor, LSC Naraina, New Delhi to Plot No. 30, First Floor & Mizzanine Floor, Commercial Complex Naraina Industrial Area, Phase I, New Delhi - 110028. A copy of the said order has been annexed to the present petition as Annexure 14.

It is also submitted that the excise license of the petitioner is due to expire on 31.07.2022, whereafter it may not be able to sell the stock lying in the sealed premises. Learned counsel has prayed that in case the subject premises are temporarily de-sealed by the respondent/Corporation, the petitioner would be able to shift the stock lying in the aforesaid premises to the newly allotted premises.

4. Issue notice.

5. Ms. Monika Arora, learned counsel for the respondents, accepts notice and, on instructions, submits that the petitioner's request for temporary de-sealing of Shop Nos.B-45, 44-A and 29, Ground Floor, Block-A, LSC Market has already been approved vide letter/order dated 05.05.2022 issued by the Corporation. As per the said letter, the subject premises were directed to be tempo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top