Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Anugya Gupta – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interim injunction for trademark protection (Para 1) |
| 2. background on the plaintiff's trademark and online presence (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. defendants' claims and counters against plaintiff's assertions (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. court's preliminary observations on trademark use (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. legal principles on domain names and trademarks (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. analysis of prima facie case and likelihood of confusion (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. final order granting injunction against defendants (Para 37 , 38) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J.
I.A.No.9022/2020 (Stay)
1. The above application has been filed by the plaintiff praying for the following ad interim reliefs:
"(i) Pass an order of interim injunction restraining the Defendant Nos. 1 and 2, their owners, partners, proprietors, officers, servants, employees, and all others in capacity of principal or agent acting for and on their behalf, or anyone claiming through, by or under, them from using the marks "SARKARI RESULT", "SARKARIRESULT.INFO", "SARKARIRESULTS.INFO", 
or any deceptive variant thereof which are identical and/or simil
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
