SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Rana Charis – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal challenging delay in filing (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments on sufficiency of cause for delay (Para 4 , 10 , 22)
3. interpretation of sufficient cause under limitation act (Para 5 , 6 , 11)
4. judicial discretion on condonation of delay (Para 8 , 9)
5. outcome of the appeal (Para 12 , 45)
6. factual background of the suit (Para 14 , 15)
7. court’s view on jurisdiction and cause of action (Para 16 , 19 , 25)
8. jurisdictional principles applied (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
9. nature of parties involved in the suit (Para 41 , 42 , 43)

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Kumar Jain, J.

CM No. 3306/2019 in RFA No. 8 /2019 (For condonation of delay)

1. The appellants have filed the present appeal challenging the judgment and decree dated 17.09.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in Civil Suit No. 1090/2013 titled as M/s Rana Chairs Vs Director General (Town Planning), Kolkata Municipal Corporation & others after delay of 1150 days.

2. The appellants filed the present application under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 1150 days in filing present appeal. The appellants pleaded that appellant no. 1 did not participate in the proceedings pertaining to su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top