Back
M. V. MURALIDARAN
K. Ashang Kom, S/o. K. Lalkhopao Kom – Appellant
Versus
Md. Najimuddin Shah, s/o. Md. Manuwar Ali – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(M.V. Muralidaran, J.) :
This petition has been filed by the petitioners to condone the delay of 528 days in filing the appeal against the judgment and order dated 13.3.2018 passed in O.S.No.67 of 2012 on the file of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Imphal East.
2. Originally, M.C.(RFA) No.26 of 2019 has been filed by the defendants 1 and 2 in the suit. Pending M.C.(RFA) No.26 of 2019, the second defendant died and his legal heirs were impleaded as petitioner Nos.2(a) to 2(e) as per the order of this Court dated 19.4.2021 in MC(RFA) No.6 of 2021. Similarly, the second plaintiff died pending M.C.(RFA) No.26 of 2019 and his legal heirs were impleaded as respondent Nos.2(a) to 2(e) as per the order passed in MC (RFA) No.10 of 2020.
3. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners, on being informed by his conducting counsel that judgment and decree has been passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Imphal East in favour of the plaintiffs in O.S.No.67 of 2012, instructed their conducting counsel to file an appeal against the judgment dated 13.3.2018 and after obtaining the certified copies of decree and judgment, appeal was filed on 10.8.2018 along with an applicatio
The court held that the application for condonation of delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act should be construed liberally to ensure substantial justice, especially when the delay is influenced....
The discretion to condone delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act must be exercised judiciously, ensuring substantial justice while adhering to statutory principles.
The court emphasized that a request for condoning a delay must be supported by credible evidence, reiterating strict adherence to limitation laws and principles of public policy that discourage undue....
The court ruled that mere negligence and inaction do not constitute sufficient cause for condoning a significant delay in filing an appeal.
The Court must balance the need for substantial justice against the necessity of adhering to procedural timelines, requiring satisfactory explanations for delays.
Insufficient cause for condoning the delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act leads to dismissal of the appeal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
