SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
DLF Homes Rajapura Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
O.P. Mehta – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the consumer case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. petitioner argues complaint abated due to legal requirements. (Para 13 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20)
3. court analyses petitioner's arguments against ncdrc decision. (Para 16 , 17 , 32 , 33)
4. court establishes application of order xxii rules. (Para 31 , 41 , 44)
5. court quashes ncdrc's impugned order for lack of sufficient cause. (Para 80 , 81 , 82 , 83)

JUDGMENT

Factual Backdrop

1. Consumer Case No. 697/2018 was preferred by O.P. Mehta and Siddharth Wadia, the respondents herein, against the petitioner DLF Homes Rajapura Pvt Ltd, before the learned National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("the learned NCDRC") under Section 12(1)(c)1 read with Section 13(6)2 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ("the Act", hereinafter) read with Order I Rule 83 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).

2. Consumer Case No. 697/2018 would be referred to, hereinafter, as "the complaint".

3. Consumer Case No. 697/2018 was filed as a "joint consumer complaint", and was stated to have been "preferred in a representative capacity ....for the benefit of entire class of persons having the same interest", bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top