SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Siddhatha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ajit Singh Bawa – Respondent


Table of Content
1. formation of lease agreement and tenant obligations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. respondent's basis for lease termination. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. appellant's claims challenging court's decision. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court's reasoning on tenant's obligations under lease. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16)
5. judgment reinforcement and rejection of appeal. (Para 17 , 18)
6. final dismissal of the appeal. (Para 19)

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Banerjee, J. Appellant-tenant, the original defendant before the learned trial court (hereinafter referred as "Appellant"), has preferred the instant appeal against the impugned judgement dated 19.02.2022, whereby, the learned trial court has allowed the application under Order XIII A of The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred as "CPC") read with Section 151, CPC read with Section 3 of The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter collectively referred as "Order XIII A application") filed by the respondent-landlord, the original plaintiff before the learned trial court (hereinafter referred as "Respondent") and decreed the suit in favour of the respondent and against the appellant.

2. Succinctly put, the respondent instituted a suit for posses

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top