IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Chandra Dhari Singh, J.
Nishant Chawla - Appellant
Versus
Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8096 of 2012
Decided On : 12-07-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments supporting pay scale upgradation. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 3. court's analysis on pay parity and legal principles. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 4. conclusion on entitlement for pay scale. (Para 49 , 50) |
| 5. final outcome of the petition. (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for issuance of appropriate writ to quash and set aside order dated 27th August 2012 and for directing the respondents to grant benefit of upgraded pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 with consequential benefits and arrears thereof to the petitioner.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. In April 1998, the petitioner herein, qualified the All India Competitive Exam of the year 1996 conducted by the Staff Selection Commission and was inducted into government service as Stenographer Grade `D'. The petitioner joined the Indian Coast Guard at New Delhi. Respondent no.3/Department of Telecommunications, vide letter bearing No.10-16/2000-Restg. dated 4th September 2000 conveyed that 16 categories of temporary posts in Respondent No.1/Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal were created with a sanction of competent authority. Out of the 16 categories of temporary posts, 3 posts of Stenographer Grade `C' in the pay-scale of Rs.5500-175-9000 were created. All the posts were to be filled up by Respondent No. 1 on deputation basis from persons holding analogous posts in that pay-scale or from persons eligible to be promoted in that pay-scale.
3. The respondent no.3 vide Order bearing no.10-16/2000-Restg, dated 7th November 2000, conveyed the sanction of the President for creation of 6 categories of temporary posts in respondent no. 1, including 2 posts of Assistants in Central Secretariat Service (hereinafter "CSS") in the pay-scale of Rs.5500-9000. All the posts were to be filled up by the respondent no. l on deputation basis from persons holding analogous posts in that pay-scale or from persons eligible to be promoted in that pay-scale. On 8th November 2000/30th November 2000, Ministry of Communications issued a Circular bearing no. A-22013/11/2000-Admn.II for filling up of temporary posts in respondent no. 1. Vide aforesaid circular, it was proposed to fill up the temporary posts in Respondent No. 1 from amongst the officials/officers from all the Ministries/Departments of the Government of India on deputation basis, which included 3 posts of Stenographer Grade 'C. in the pay-scale of Rs.5500-9000 and 2 posts of Stenographer Grade 'D' in the pay-scale of Rs.4000-6000.
4. Respondent No.3 issued a Notification bearing G.S.R.575(E) dated 2nd August 2001, making the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (Salary, Allowances and other Conditions of Service of the Officers and Employees) Rules, 2001.
5. Thereafter, on 5th June 2003, the Respondent No.3 made the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal Group 'C and Group 'D' Posts Recruitment Rules, 2003, wherein number of posts, classification and scale of pay have been specified in the Schedule attached thereto. The classification of posts of Stenographer Grade 'D' is General Central Service Group `C' Non-Gazetted - Ministerial' having a pay scale of Rs.4000-100-6000 and are required to be filled up by direct recruitment. Stenographer Grade 'D' is the feeder post for promotion to the post of Stenographer Grade 'C., for which recruitment rules are yet to be finalized. The post of Stenographer Grade 'D' is equivalent to the post of Stenographer Grade 'D' in Central Secretariat Stenographer Service (hereinafter "CSSS") in terms of its nomenclature as well as scale of pay and classification.
6. Respondent No.1 advertised for filling up the temporary posts and in pursuance of the said advertisement, the Petitioner applied and jo
The principle of equal pay for equal work does not entitle employees to claim parity in pay scales if their recruitment processes differ significantly.
The principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' is not strictly applied; disparities based on recruitment methods and job responsibilities justify differences in pay.
The Court affirmed the principle of historical parity in pay scales between Central Secretariat Services and field office employees, mandating equal pay for equal work.
The principle of equal pay for equal work under Articles 14 and 39(d) of the Constitution mandates that employees performing similar duties be compensated equally, regardless of title discrepancies.
Direct appointees entitled to pay parity with transferred employees and departmental counterparts performing identical duties, as unequal pay scales violate Articles 14/16; courts rectify arbitrary a....
The judgment establishes that the principle of 'equal pay for equal work' must consider the nature of work, duties, and responsibilities, and that the determination of pay scales falls within the exc....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.