Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Fresenius Medical Care India Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Kerry Indev Logistics Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appointment of arbitrator under arbitration act (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. dispute over liability and subrogation rights (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. distinction between assignment and subrogation (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. decision to appoint sole arbitrator (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 5. final order and conclusion (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. By these petitions under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, petitioner seeks appointment of the respondent's nominee on the Arbitral Tribunal to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
2. In ARB. P. 180/2022 and ARB. P. 181/20220, petitioner seeks appointment of the nominee of the respondent to Arbitral Tribunal pursuant to the Warehousing &Logistics agreement dated 15.03.2019 and 01.11.2018 respectively.
3. The terms and conditions of both the agreements are nearly identical and the factual matrix giving rise to the claims is also identical. The issues arising for consideration in the two petitions are common. Consequently, both the petitions are being disposed of by a common judgment.
4. Petitioner, as well as Respondent, entered into the re
Subrogation allows insurers to recover amounts paid to the insured while the insured retains rights to deficiencies; the court clarified distinctions between assignment and subrogation-cum-assignment....
A subrogation clause in an insurance contract does not allow an insurer to sue in its own name without an absolute assignment of rights from the insured.
The court affirmed that under subrogation laws, an insurer can claim losses from a third party if the insured has been indemnified, establishing a valid bailment relationship and the duty of care owe....
The court emphasized the limited role of the courts in deciding applications under Section 11, focusing on the prima facie ascertainment of the existence of a legal and binding arbitration agreement ....
The business activities at the manufacturing unit at Hazira were irrelevant for assessing the loss suffered due to business interruption at the manufacturing unit at Dahej.
The claimant lacked legal standing to pursue insurance claims as rights had transferred to another entity, rendering the arbitration ineffective.
The court emphasized the necessity of adhering to procedural requirements in contracts before arbitration can be invoked, underscoring the importance of a harmonized interpretation of contract clause....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
