Satya Prakash vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Satya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner participated in civil services examination but was not granted appointment. (Para 2 , 10)
2. supreme court directed service allocation to the petitioner, which was not complied with. (Para 4 , 7)
3. petitioner sought remedy through contempt petition due to non-compliance of supreme court's order. (Para 5 , 8)
4. tribunal considered petitions regarding appointment, seniority, and decisions made against the petitioner. (Para 12 , 14 , 17)
5. writ petition dismissed; no grounds for interference found. (Para 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The present writ petition is arising out of the order dated 14.08.2013 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, O.A. No. 1744/2007, dismissing the Original Application preferred by the writ petitioner claiming appointment in Group `A'/Group `B' of the Central Civil Services as well as rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of seniority.

2. Facts of the case reveals that the petitioner before this Court participated in the Civil Services Examination, 1996 - which was conducted by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), and was not able to achieve a berth in all of the services no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADSatya Prakash – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Satya Prakash – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent