DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. intestacy and heirship rights established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's admission of share not acknowledged. (Para 5) |
| 3. ownership and share distribution confirmed. (Para 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. preliminary decree of partition granted. (Para 10) |
| 5. further proceedings scheduled for final decree. (Para 11) |
JUDGMENT
1. Suit for partition, rendition of accounts with consequential relief of permanent injunction has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.
2. Facts in brief are that Late Sh. Ratan Lal, was the absolute owner and in possession of property bearing No. 1, Near Shiv Mandir, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044 and property bearing no. 230, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044. He died intestate on 05.09.2002 and was survived by plaintiff/daughter-Smt. Sunita and 4 sons-Ravinder, Anoop, Ashok and Rajeev who are the defendants. Ashok died on 27.10.2020 leaving behind his wife-Asha, Daughter-Shivali and two sons-Vishal@ laddhu and Navin@ Gaurav, who have been impleaded as defendant No. 4 to 7.
3. The property bearing No. 1, Near Shiv Mandir, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044 measuring approximately 836 sq. Meter, co
In intestate succession under Hindu law, all legal heirs have equal rights to property, entitling them to specified shares as determined by statute.
The court recognized and enforced a settlement agreement reached through mediation, affirming its validity and establishing property division post intestate succession.
The validity and lawfulness of a mutually settled Settlement Agreement can influence the court's decision in a property dispute case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.