SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Sunita – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder – Respondent


Table of Content
1. intestacy and heirship rights established. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. defendant's admission of share not acknowledged. (Para 5)
3. ownership and share distribution confirmed. (Para 6 , 8 , 9)
4. preliminary decree of partition granted. (Para 10)
5. further proceedings scheduled for final decree. (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

1. Suit for partition, rendition of accounts with consequential relief of permanent injunction has been filed on behalf of the plaintiff.

2. Facts in brief are that Late Sh. Ratan Lal, was the absolute owner and in possession of property bearing No. 1, Near Shiv Mandir, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044 and property bearing no. 230, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044. He died intestate on 05.09.2002 and was survived by plaintiff/daughter-Smt. Sunita and 4 sons-Ravinder, Anoop, Ashok and Rajeev who are the defendants. Ashok died on 27.10.2020 leaving behind his wife-Asha, Daughter-Shivali and two sons-Vishal@ laddhu and Navin@ Gaurav, who have been impleaded as defendant No. 4 to 7.

3. The property bearing No. 1, Near Shiv Mandir, Zalim Mohalla, Village Tukhlakabad, New Delhi-110044 measuring approximately 836 sq. Meter, co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top