Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
VIPIN SANGHI, JASMEET SINGH
Sanjay Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common thread in writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the tender process. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against disqualification. (Para 10 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. fraud implications and certificate genuineness. (Para 12 , 13 , 28) |
| 5. challenge to the blacklisting order. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. court's decision on the petitions. (Para 60 , 61) |
JUDGMENT
Jasmeet Singh, J. (Oral)--The three writ petitions have a common thread and overlapping factual matrix as well as legal issues. In addition, the parties to the three writ petitions are also the same, and hence, all 3 writ petitions have been taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. The petitioner is a registered partnership firm engaged in the business of construction of road, buildings, bridges and other infrastructure projects across the country. The respondent No.1 is a PSU of the Government of India, involved in execution of various works of Central Departments and its PSUs. Respondent No. 2 is the officer of respondent No. 1 and the tender inviting authority.
3. With this common background, we now reproduce the factual matrix of the individual Petitions.
W.P.(C) 5426
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
