JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. (Oral)--The three writ petitions have a common thread and overlapping factual matrix as well as legal issues. In addition, the parties to the three writ petitions are also the same, and hence, all 3 writ petitions have been taken up together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. The petitioner is a registered partnership firm engaged in the business of construction of road, buildings, bridges and other infrastructure projects across the country. The respondent No.1 is a PSU of the Government of India, involved in execution of various works of Central Departments and its PSUs. Respondent No. 2 is the officer of respondent No. 1 and the tender inviting authority.

3. With this common background, we now reproduce the factual matrix of the individual Petitions.

W.P.(C) 5426/2021

4. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following substantial prayers:

a. "Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other appropriate WRIT, order or direction, thereby, holding the disqualification of the Petitioner as illegal and arbitrary; and direct the Respondents No.1 and 2 to open the Financial Bid of the Petitioner pursuant to NIT No. NPCC/PR