SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. identification of parties involved in the dispute. (Para 2 , 3)
2. factual background of contracts and financial obligations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9)
3. arguments against objections regarding section 9 applicability. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. contentions regarding maintainability based on jurisdiction. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
5. jurisdictional objections and their implications for the case. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. merits of segcl's claims and challenges raised by reliance. (Para 79 , 80 , 81 , 82)
7. recommendations against granting interim relief. (Para 86 , 87 , 88)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. The present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] seeks interim measures for securing the amount in dispute in arbitration payable in terms of a Guarantee Letter dated 26th June, 2008 issued by the Respondent as well as injunctive reliefs restraining the Respondent from selling, transferring or otherwise disposing of and/or creating any encumbrances on its assets during the pendency of the arbitration proceedings.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE

FACTS

CONTENTIONS ADVANCED

I. ON BEHALF OF SEGCL

A. Reliance's

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top