SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Yashwant Varma, J.
Prakash Industries Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforecement - Respondent
W.P.(C) 14999 of 2021, CM Nos. 47329 of 2021, 553 of 2022, 10949 of 2022 and W.P.(C) 15000 of 2021, CM Nos. 47331 of 2021, 547 of 2022, 10952 of 2022
Decided On : 19-07-2022




The allocation of coal does not constitute proceeds of crime under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act if no illegal gains are derived or shown, particularly after quashing of the related first chargesheet.

Headnote:(A) Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 - Sections 2(1)(u) and 3 - Challenge to attachment proceedings initiated by Enforcement Directorate against Prakash Industries Limited involving allocation of coal block under alleged misrepresentation - Court finds allocation does not amount to proceeds of crime as it does not confer ownership - No predicate offence established post quashing of first chargesheet - Allegations regarding derived illegal gains not substantiated. (Paras 100-108)

(B) Principle of money laundering - To establish a charge, there must be evidence of criminal activity yielding profits categorized as proceeds of crime - Once predicate offence is annulled, money laundering allegations cannot sustain. (Paras 92-96)

(C) Article 20(1) of Constitution - The safeguard prohibits conviction under ex post facto laws, ensuring individuals are not penalized for actions not recognized as offenses at the time of commission, thus protecting pre-enforcement conduct from punitive measures under the act. (Paras 100-102)

(D) Operative directions: The impugned attachment orders and proceedings against petitioners quashed due to lack of substantive evidence linking them to proceeds of crime derived from predicate offences. (Paras 109)

Table of Content
1. initial framework and challenges under pmla (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background facts on coal allocation and relevant firs (Para 5 , 7 , 20)
3. arguments presented regarding jurisdiction and violations (Para 11 , 26 , 27 , 30)
4. court's observations on legal procedures and principles (Para 12 , 16 , 21)
5. conclusions on the impact of quashing the first chargesheet (Para 100 , 101)
6. final directives and quashing of attachments (Para 108 , 109)

JUDGMENT

1. For the purposes of ease of reference, this decision has been divided under the following categories:

A. INTRODUCTION

B. WHETHER PROCEEDINGS LIABLE TO BE DEFERRED

C. PRELIMINARY OBJECTION

D. THE BACKGROUND

E. SUBMISSIONS

F. MONEY LAUNDERING - A STAND ALONE OFFENSE

G. THE ARTICLE 20(1) ARGUMENT

H. AXIS BANK VS. SEEMA GARG

I. WHETHER ALLOCATION OF COAL IS PROCEEDS OF CRIME

J. THE IMPACT OF QUASHING OF THE FIRST CHARGESHEET

K. WHETHER ARTICLE 20(1) IN FACT VIOLATED

L. IMPUGNED ATTACHMENT AND EQUIVALENT VALUE

M. CONCLUSIONS

N. OPERATIVE DIRECTIONS

A. INTRODUCTION

2. These two writ petitions challenge proceedings initiated by the Directorate of Enforcement, the respondents herein, under the provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 20021 . The leading writ petition had come to be preferred at a time when a provisional order of attachment came to be made under the Act. The Court, by its order of 06 January 2022, entertained the writ petition and called upon the respondents to file their replies. On 03 March 2022, this Court took notice of the proceedings initiated by the Adjudicating Authority before whom the matter came to be placed for the purposes of confirmation of the provisional order of attachment. Taking note of the rival submissions, this Court on that date allowed the amendments proposed and passed the following detailed order:

    "CM APPL. 10948/2022 (for amendment of petition) in W.P.(C) 14999/2021 CM APPL. 10951/2022 (for amendment of petition) in W.P.(C) 15000/2021

    The record reflects that the present petition was instituted at a stage when a Provisional Order of Attachment had come to be made in terms of the provisions of Section 5 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA]. The submissions of respective parties were noticed in some detail in the order of 06 January 2022. Pursuant to that order, parties were directed to exchange pleadings. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have subsequently come to be filed. By way of the present application for amendment, the petitioners lay challenge to the notices issued under Section 8 of the PMLA by the Adjudicating Authority.

    Learned counsel appearing for the Enforcement Directorate has, at the outset, submitted that in the fitness of things, the petitioners should be called upon to file their replies to the show-cause notices leaving it open to the Adjudicating Authority to decide all contentions which are urged before this Court.

    While ordinarily that may have sufficed, this Court notes that, by the order of 06 January 2022, the challenge to the initiation of proceedings under the PMLA on jurisdictional grounds was duly entertained. The Court had taken notice of the challenge mounted on the ground that the offenses which are alleged to have been committed, were not enumerated as a "scheduled offense" at the relevant point of time. In that view of the matter and since the Court has already taken note of the challenge raised, it would be inappropriate to grant liberty to the Adjudicating Authority to independently rule on the questions which are raised here.

    The amendments essentially assail further proceedings and steps taken pursuant to the Provisional Order of Attachment. In view of the aforesaid, the amendments as proposed by way of the present application are allowed.

    The Court notes that the amended writ petition already exists on the record.

    The application shall stand disposed of.

    W.P.(C) 14999/2021 & CM APPLs. 47329/2021, 553/2022, 10949/2022

    W.P.(C) 15000/2021 & CM APPLs. 47331/2021,













































  • Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    Judicial Analysis

    AI

    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top