Bhagwan Prasad vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Bhagwan Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek pay increments based on promotion dates. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. previous judgment supports current petitioners' claims. (Para 5)
3. court directs respondents to resolve petitions as representations. (Para 6)
4. petitions disposed of with directions. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The issue(s) raised in these petitions and the relief(s) sought are similar, therefore, these petitions are heard together and being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Vide W.P.(C) 7655/2022, petitioners seek directions to the respondents to reckon date of assumption of charge by petitioners to the post of Sub Inspector (Ministerial) with effect from date of promotion of petitioners to post of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) and consequently grant one increment on 01.01.2006 in the pre-revised pay scale and thereafter next increment in the revised pay structure on 01.07.2006 in terms of paragraph 3 of office memorandum dated 19.03.2012 and other consequential benefits.

3. Vide W.P.(C) 8151/2022, petitioners seek directions to the respondents to reckon date of assumption of charge by petitioners to the rank of Head Constable (Ministerial) with effect from date of their appoi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document