SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Vaibhav Raheja – Appellant
Versus
Shutham Electric Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition for appointment of arbitrator. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. jurisdiction objections by respondent. (Para 6 , 7 , 9)
3. analysis on jurisdiction and arbitration clause. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conclusion and order for arbitration appointment. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition under section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 (`A&C Act' for short), the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that are stated to have arisen with the respondents from Loan Agreement dated 14.07.2013.

2. Notice on this petition was issued on 22.10.2020; consequent to which respondent No. 1 has filed its reply dated 11.01.2021 to the petition.

3. Order dated 28.02.2022 of the learned Joint Registrar records that as per affidavit of service dated 28.02.2022, the notice issued to respondent No. 2 on his first address was received back with a `refusal report'. Report dated 06.05.2022 submitted by the office of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune records that respondent No. 2 has been served.

4. In view of the above this court is satisfied t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top