Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Arjun Sethi – Appellant
Versus
All About Outdoor Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for appointment of arbitrator under arbitration act. (Para 1) |
| 2. respondent's contention on jurisdiction based on venue. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's argument on party autonomy and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's analysis on jurisdiction and party agreements. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. appointment of sole arbitrator and order. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT
[VIA HYBRID MODE]
Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral)--The present petition under Section 11 (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudication of disputes arising from/in relation to a `Consultancy Agreement' dated 9th April, 2018 [hereinafter, "Agreement"]. The said Agreement contains an arbitration clause, which is peculiarly worded and reads as follows:
"2. This Agreement and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual dispute disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and shall be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator and the venue of Arbitration will be at Gu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
