SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Kranti Arora – Appellant
Versus
Digjam Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sudhir Kumar Jain, J.

CM(M) NO 51983 OF 2018 (Application for Impleadment).

1. This order shall decide an application under Order I Rule 10(2) read with Order I Rule 8A and section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "the CPC") filed by the applicant O.P.Khaitan (HUF) for impleadment.

2. The factual background as appearing from record and necessary to mention to decide present application is that R.B.S. Basakha Singh was lessee of piece of plot admeasuring 1.398 acres bearing no 6-A, block no. 11, known as 3& 4, South End Road Lane, New Delhi-110001 vide registered perpetual lease deed dated 04.11.1942 effective from 23.04.1929 executed between Governor-General in Council and R.B.S. Basakha Singh. R.B.S. Basakha Singh transferred right, title and interest in respect of said plot along with built up structure thereon in favor of his daughter namely Bibi Barrinder Kaur (now known as Birender Amarjit Singh) vide registered Gift Deed dated 14.04.1947. Birender Amarjit Singh transferred rights, title and interest in respect of one-half share in said plot in favor of her son namely Inder Vijay Singh and two daughters namely Tavleen Singh and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top