SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Virender Kumar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Akhtar Ali – Respondent


Table of Content
1. exemption from rules granted. (Para 1 , 2)
2. article 227 invoked for expedited proceedings. (Para 3)
3. court's limitations on issuing time-bound directions. (Para 4 , 5)
4. matter to be prioritized by arc without further directions. (Para 6 , 7)

JUDGMENT

CM No.31085/2022 (exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CM(M) 675/2022 & CM No.31084/2022 (stay)

3. This is yet another petition in which Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been invoked to secure a direction to the Court in seisin of the matter, to dispose of the proceedings within a particular time frame.

4. I have repeatedly observed that it is not possible for this Court to issue such directions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Courts are required to prioritise the work before them. It is not known as to how many matters, of greater vintage or greater urgency than that of the petitioner, are presently pending before the learned Trial Court.

5. Besides, for over two years, working of Trial Courts was badly affected owing to the COVID-19 pandemic and, even now, complete normalcy is yet to be restored. In such unenv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top