Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Rajender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ravinder – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to conditional leave based on financial means. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding modification of deposit conditions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's take on financial capabilities of petitioner. (Para 5) |
| 4. modification of deposit requirement set by the court. (Para 6) |
| 5. conclusion and disposal of the petition. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
1. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 04.09.2019 in suit bearing No.CS 76394/2016 titled as Sh. Ravinder vs. Rajender. The learned Trial Court has granted conditional leave to defend subject to the deposit of Rs.7 lakhs.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Safai Karamchari and has no means to deposit Rs.7 lakhs. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the facts of the case are very peculiar in nature as the respondent/plaintiff is also a government servant and has stated to have extended the loan amount in cash.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 04.09.2019 may be modified to the extent that the condition of Rs.7 lakh is waive
A court can modify conditions for leave to defend based on the litigant's financial circumstances while ensuring adequate security for the opposing party's claims.
Conditional grant of leave to defend under CPC is permissible where the court finds insufficient justification for disputing claims, recognizing that unconditional leave is typically granted when tri....
The court has the discretion to modify deposit terms based on the petitioner's financial condition without intervening under the Supervisory Jurisdiction.
The court may consider the financial incapacity of a party and the interest of justice in directing the deposit of a specified amount to contest a suit.
The court upheld that failure to comply with the deposit requirement negated the appellant's claims of fraud regarding the cheques, justifying the trial court's decree in favor of the respondent.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's discretion to grant conditional leave to defend based on the defendant's disclosure of a fair and reasonable defense, ensuring a delica....
The distinction between a disputed claim and an admitted claim in a suit filed under Order XXXVII of CPC and the condition precedent for granting leave to defend based on the admitted amount.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
