SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Mamta Desaur – Appellant
Versus
Vivek Aggarwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The impugned order dated 20th July 2022, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court) (the learned Commercial Court), in CS (Comm) 173/2021 (Vivek Aggarwal v. Mamta Desaur), subjects the grant of leave to defend, to the petitioner, under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) to a condition of deposit of Rs.9,69,548/- with the court.

2. The aforesaid requirement of deposit, by the petitioner, of Rs.9,69,548/-, as a condition for grant of leave to defend the suit instituted by the respondent against the petitioner has been assailed by the petitioner, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, in another words, submits that he is entitled to unconditional leave to defend.

3. A brief recital of facts would be appropriate.

4. The respondent, as the plaintiff in CS (Comm) 173/2021, claimed to have been involved in a business relationship with the petitioner since 2012. The plaint asserts that, against purchase orders placed by the petitioner on the respondent, the petitioner was making timely payments. However, against goods worth Rs.10,78,575/-, stated to have been supplied by the respondent to the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top