SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Shakeel Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. overview of procedural history and complaints. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. delay in filing applications and justifications. (Para 7 , 9 , 10)
3. analysis of related judgment and discretion. (Para 8 , 11 , 12)
4. justifying relief based on comparable treatment. (Para 13)
5. final order regarding the petitioner’s case. (Para 14)

JUDGMENT

1. The present writ petition is arising out of order dated 01.01.2003 as well as order dated 13.03.2003 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing O.A. No.2528/2001 & and the review petition, being R.A.No.76/2003, arising out of O.A. No.2528/2001, titled as Constable Sakeel Ahmed v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

2. The Petitioner has filed the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:

    "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, direction or order quashing the Impugned Orders dated 01.01,2003 & 13.03.2003 passed by Hon'ble Central Administrative Tribunal dismissing the O.A. No.2528 of 2001 and R.A. No.76 of 2003; and

    (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari or any other writ, direction or order qua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top