SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Virgo Softech Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Uanup Jairam Bhambhani, J. (Oral)

Arb. P. 802/2021

1. By way of the present petition under section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996 ('A&C Act' for short), the petitioner seeks appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes that are stated to have arisen with the respondent from Contract dated 09.01.2012 (`contract' for short).

2. Notice on this petition was issued on 24.08.2021; consequent to which the respondent has filed its counter-affidavit dated 21.04.2022.

3. Ms. Sunanda Tulsyan, learned counsel for the petitioner has invited the attention of this court to clause 8.2 of the General Conditions of Contract (`GCCs' for short) annexed to the contract which comprises the arbitration agreement between the parties. Clause 8.2(a) contemplates reference of disputes between the parties to arbitration in accordance with the A&C Act; and clause 8.2(b) provides that arbitration proceedings shall be held in New Delhi.

4. At this point, it would be relevant to extract the relevant clauses of the contract, including the GCCs and the Special Conditions of Contract (`SCCs' for short), which read as follows:

    General Conditions of Contract

    "8. SETTLEME






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top