SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
POONAM A.BAMBA
Mohd. Sadab Khan – Appellant
Versus
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Poonam S. Bamba, J. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C for grant of anticipatory bail moved on behalf of the petitioner in case FIR No. 475/2022 dated 13.07.2022, under Sections 376/506 IPC, PS Desh Bandhu Gupta (DBG) Road.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the complainant. It is further submitted that the petitioner and the complainant/prosecutrix knew each other since 2019 being the employees of Jamia Milia Islamia University and were in consensual relationship; whatsapp chat exchanged between them clearly shows the relationship they shared.

2.1. It is also submitted that the petitioner as well as the respondent no. 2 were very well aware that both of them were already married and as such, there was no occasion for the petitioner to seek sexual favour from the respondent no. 2 on false promise of marriage. However, the respondent no. 2 started making unreasonable demands from the petitioner under the garb of their relationship; and ultimately on 13.04.2022, an agreement was executed between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2, according to which, the petitioner had to purchase a flat amounting to Rs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top