NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Riyazuddin – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
3. Apprehending his arrest in Case Crime No.551 of 2019, under Sections 376, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Tanda, District Rampur, the applicant -Riyazuddin has filed this anticipatory bail application seeking anticipatory bail in the aforesaid crime number.
4. It is alleged in the F.I.R. that on the false pretext of marriage, the accused applicant made physical relations with the prosecutrix for about one year and subsequently refused to marry her and threatened her to kill. F.I.R. was lodged on 16.11.2019 and investigation started and now charge-sheet has been submitted.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and he has apprehension of his arrest in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against her. He has been falsely implicated into this matter. Allegations levelled against the applicant are false. The investigation of the case has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed. It is further submitted that the applicant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.