IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Yashwant Varma, J.
JBM Electric Vehicles Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8047 of 2022
Decided On : 08-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. debarment based on incorrect revenue disclosure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. application eligibility criteria under pli scheme. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. decisions made upon complaints must follow fair procedures. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. eligibility criteria for pli scheme defined. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. guidelines for debarment and necessity of natural justice. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. right to fair hearing in context of blacklisting. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. record keeping and communication of decisions is essential. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 8. legal representation and noticing principles highlighted. (Para 23 , 24) |
| 9. condition of issuance of show cause notice discussed. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. balancing administrative power and natural justice. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 11. impact of non-compliance with natural justice principles. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. doctrine of prejudice and its implications. (Para 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 13. clarifying natural justice in decision making. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 14. assessment of vague stipulations in regulations. (Para 38 , 39) |
| 15. cases lacking notice prior to debarment. (Para 40 , 41) |
| 16. ruling against arbitrary decision making leads to quashing. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 17. decision making must align with fair principles. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner, JBM Electric Vehicles Private Limited has petitioned this Court impugning the letter dated 25 April and 29 April 2022 issued by the Ministry of Heavy Industries [MHI] and IFCI Limited. The communication essentially debars the petitioner and its group companies from all future tenders and for the period of the Production Linked Incentive Scheme [PLI Scheme] upto 31 March 2027. The aforesaid action is stated to have been taken upon it being found that the petitioner had furnished incorrect information for the purposes of claiming benefits under the PLI Scheme. The second letter impugned in the writ petition is a communication from IFCI holding that the petitioner had submitted an application for extension of benefits under the PLI Scheme basing its Global Group Revenue to be Rs.10,590.74 crores. IFCI contends that on scrutiny it has been found that the aforesaid declaration is incorrect since it also includes revenue of Rs.910.50 crores from intra-group sales. IFCI goes on to hold that the inclusion of that revenue enabled the petitioner to project that it met the eligibility criteria. This action according to the respondents clearly amounted to a violation of the Integrity Pact Undertaking submitted by the petitioner and consequently warranted its debarment from all tenders of MHI that may be issued during the pendency of the PLI Scheme and up to 31 March 2027. This communication also refers to the letter of the MHI dated 25 April 2022 referred to above. In order to appreciate the challenge which is raised in the writ petition it would be apposite to notice the following essential facts.
2. On 23 September 2021 the Union Government announced the PLI Scheme for the automobile and auto component industry. The PLI Scheme proposed financial incentives to boost domestic manufacturing of advanced automotive technology products and to attract investment in the automotive manufacturing value chain. The Basic Eligibility Criteria was specified as being companies or group companies with an existing presence in India or globally in the automotive vehicle and components manufacturing business having a Global Group Revenue of a minimum of Rs.10,000 crores. Clause 3.2 which set out the eligibility criteria for applicants is reproduced hereinbelow:
"3.2 Eligibility: The applicant company or its Group company(ies) will need to meet the following common criteria to qualify and receive benefits under the Scheme:
Basic Eligibility Criteria:
(a) For company or its Group company(ies) with existing presence in India or globally in the Automotive vehicle and components manufacturing business:
| Eligibility Criteria | Auto OEM | Auto-Component |
| Global group* Revenue (from automotive and/or auto comp | ||
The decision to debar the petitioner lacked due process as it failed to provide notice and an opportunity for hearing, rendering the action arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice.
Debarment actions require adherence to natural justice; exclusion of intra-group sales from GGR calculations is not mandated under the PLI Scheme, making debarring unjustified.
Contract – Tender - Natural justice is a flexible tool in the hands of the judiciary to reach out in fit cases to remedy injustice. The breach of the audi alteram partem rule cannot by itself, withou....
The requirement for a fair hearing and a specific show cause notice before imposing the severe civil consequence of blacklisting, and the need for the authority to determine the period of punishment ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.