SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) – Appellant
Versus
Gionee Communication Equipment Co. Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J.

I.A. 2473/2019

1. This is an application filed by the defendant no.2/applicant under Order XI Rules 3 and 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, `CPC'), as applicable to commercial disputes, praying for the production of the following documents by the plaintiff/non-applicant:

    "a. License Agreements entered into by the Plaintiff with various parties in the same trade as Defendant No.2 more particularly HTC, LG, Apple, Samsung, Huawei, ZTE, CoolPad etc

    b. 100 global license agreements entered into by the Plaintiff in relation to its portfolio of alleged Standard Essential Patents from most recent to the date of filing the Suit; and

    c. Declarations of Essentiality made by the Plaintiff to ETSI in respect of the eight suit patents.

    d. All licensing agreements the Plaintiff has entered into with entities in India with respect to the suit patents and all statements of working filed by Plaintiff under section 146 of the Patents Act with respect to the suit patents.

    e. Complete agreements between Plaintiff and Qualcomm and all documents relating to any offers made, negotiations held or agreements entered into any time by and between the Plaintiff and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top