Aap Ki Pasand vs Himalayan Leaf Pvt. Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Aap Ki Pasand – Appellant
Versus
Himalayan Leaf Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. filing of additional documents in court. (Para 1)
2. defendant's arguments for document relevance. (Para 2 , 4)
3. court's liberal stance on document inclusion. (Para 3 , 5 , 12 , 13)
4. potential prejudice to the defendant. (Para 6)
5. plaintiffs' counterarguments to document inclusion. (Para 8 , 10 , 11)
6. requirements for document inclusion under cpc. (Para 16 , 22)
7. non-disclosure of documents must be justified. (Para 24 , 25)
8. delaying tactics affect trial conclusion. (Para 30 , 31)
9. partly allowing admitted documents; imposing costs. (Para 33 , 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT

I.A. 14350/2022

1. This application has been filed by the defendant under Order XI Rule 12 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, `CPC') for bringing on record the following additional documents sought to be filed on behalf of the defendant/applicant:

"a. Original packaging of the tea packet sold under the label `Mittal's Nilgiri Tea' (Document D-1)

b. Original packaging of the tea packet sold under the label `Tea for You Nilgiri Tea' (Document D-2)

c. Print out of the website of Golden Tips Tea selling their packaged tea on the website www.goldentipstea.in, https://ww

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTNAVIN CHAWLAAap Ki Pasand – AppellantVersusHimalayan Leaf Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Aap Ki Pasand – Appellant
Versus
Himalayan Leaf Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent