SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
Preet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. filing of fir based on complaint. (Para 3 , 4)
2. arguments on the nature of allegations. (Para 5 , 6)
3. state's opposition and context. (Para 7 , 8)
4. principles for quashing an fir. (Para 10 , 11)
5. circumstances for dismissing the petition. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. court's final ruling. (Para 15)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

CRL.M.A. 15261/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P. CRL. 1762/2022 & CRL. M.A. 15262/2022

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 378/2022 (Impugned FIR) registered under Sections 376/377/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), at P.S. Begumpur, on merits.

4. The Impugned FIR was registered on a complaint made by respondent no. 2 wherein it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 (husband of respondent no. 2) was addicted to drugs and on a specific day, petitioner no. 1 came with his friends and asked respondent no. 2 to make physical relations with his friends. Thereafter, petitioner no. 1 left the house, around 3 years ago and visited home sometimes. It is also alleged in the FIR that in the absence of petitioner no.1, petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top