SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rekha Palli, J.
Mehta Teacher Training College - Appellant
Versus
National Council for Teacher Education - Respondent
W.P.(C) 2813 of 2021, W.P.(C) 7855 of 2022 & CM Appl. 23972 of 2022, W.P.(C) 8368 of 2022 & CM Appl. 25183 of 2022 etc.
Decided On : 24-08-2022




The right to establish educational institutions is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) and can only be restricted by law; a mere policy decision cannot impose a general ban on new institutions.

Headnote:(A) National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 - Sections 3(4), 12(c), 12(f), 14, 29 and 32 - Petition challenging NCTE's refusal to open its portal for recognition applications - Court held that NCTE's refusal was arbitrary and contrary to statutory provisions mandating acceptance of applications; it must individually assess applications as per the established guidelines. (Paras 28, 31, 41, 46)

(B) Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution - Right to establish educational institutions as a fundamental right - A policy decision cannot constitutionally restrict this right; restrictions must be enacted through law under Article 19(6). The respondents' decision imposed unreasonable restrictions not backed by law. (Paras 36, 40)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an educational institution, challenged the NCTE's long-standing refusal to accept applications for new teacher training courses, arguing such refusal violated rights under the National Council for Teacher Education Act and the Constitution. The NCTE had declined applications for six years based on a policy decision perceived as arbitrary.

Findings of Court:
The court found the NCTE's decision violated the fundamental right to establish an educational institution and was not backed by legislative authority. The court ordered the NCTE to reopen the portal and process applications.

Issues: Whether the petitioners have a fundamental right to commence new teaching courses and if so, whether NCTE can impose restrictions through policy decisions rather than statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the right to establish educational institutions is protected under Article 19(1)(g) and can only be curtailed by law. The NCTE's decision, being a mere policy and lacking legislative basis, was unconstitutional.

Result: Petitions allowed; NCTE directed to open its portal.

Table of Content
1. petition concerning ncte's application submission (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments on the petitioners' rights under the ncte act (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
3. respondents' defense of regulatory authority and public interest (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
4. court's analysis of applicable legal standards and powers (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
5. constitutional rights and limitations discussed (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. assessment of the ncte's powers and its implications (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
7. final observations on the ncte's ban's impact (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49)
8. judgment to allow petitions and order opening the portal (Para 50)

JUDGMENT

Rekha Palli, J. The present batch of petitions preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India assail the decision of the National Council for Teacher Education ("NCTE") refusing to open its online web portal for submission of applications from institutions desirous of seeking recognition of teachers' education courses. The petitioners also seek a consequential direction to the respondent NCTE to open its portal and accept and process their applications for the next academic session as per clause 5(6) of the NCTE (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 ("Regulations") Since the issues raised in these petitions are common, for the sake of convenience, reference is being made only to the facts in W.P.(C) No. 2813/2021.

Brief Factual Matrix:

2. The petitioner is an unaided and self-financed educational institution established by a registered society named `Mehta Education Society'. The respondent No.1/NCTE is a statutory board established under. The National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993. ("the Act") for the purpose of achieving planned and co-ordinated development of teacher education system in the country. The respondent no.2/Western Regional Committee ("WRC") is one of the four regional committees under the respondent no.1.

3. The petitioner college upon being granted recognition by the Northern Regional Committee ("NRC") on 26.03.2015, commenced its B.Ed. course. On 30.05.2016, the petitioner, being desirous of running the integrated course of BA.B.Ed/BSc.B.Ed, submitted an application to the NRC seeking grant of recognition for running the said courses. Upon scrutiny of the petitioner's application by the NRC, it was issued a show cause notice on 19.01.2017, the petitioners' reply whereto was found unsatisfactory. Consequently, its application was rejected by the NRC on 28.04.2017.

4. Though, the petitioner could have assailed this rejection order by way of a statutory remedy of appeal before the NCTE, it did not do so and instead chose to wait for the NCTE to invite fresh applications for the next academic session. The respondents, however, did not invite any applications for grant of recognition, and instead issued public notices in the years 2017 and 2018, stating therein that, it would not be accepting any new applications for the academic sessions 2017-18 and 2018-19. The position remained the same in the next four years, except in 2019, when applications for one programme, namely the `Four-year Integrated Teacher Education Programme (Pre-Primary to Primary and Upper Primary to Secondary' ("integrated programme") from some states were invited, but even these applications were subsequently not processed. It is in these circumstances that the petitioners, who have not been able to submit any application for any new course during the last six years, i.e. after 2016, have approached this Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no.1 to open the portal and accept online applications sought to be submitted to them under clause 5(5) of the National Council for Teacher Education (Recognition Norms and Procedure) Regulations, 2014 ("the Regulations") for grant of recognition for running B.A.B.E.d/B.Sc.B.E.d course in the academic session 2022-23. The petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top