IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Suresh Kumar Kait, Saurabh Banerjee, JJ.
Ronra Khathing - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 12351 of 2022
Decided On : 25-08-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion and order of the court. (Para 1 , 2 , 12 , 13) |
| 2. petitioner's request for examination relief. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. cancellation of candidature due to no objection certificate. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. respondent's argument on requirement for noc. (Para 8) |
| 5. court's direction on issuing noc for examination. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
CM APPL. 37091 /2022 (for exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2. Application is accordingly disposed of.
W.P.(C) 12351/2022 & CM APPL. 37092/2022
3. By way of the present petition, petitioner seeks following reliefs:
"(a) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby quashing the notice/communication dated 16.08.2022 (Annexure P-5) wherein the rejection of the candidature of the Petitioner was mentioned as bad in law.
(b) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction thereby directing the Respondents to allow the Petitioner to appear in the examination being held on 28.08.2022."
4. Pursuant to Advertisement dated 22.04.2022, petitioner had applied to appear for the post of Asst. Commandant through Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (hereinafter referred as 'LDCE') for the vacancies years 2018-22, well before the last date of applying for said examination, i.e., 30.05.2022.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in communication dated 16.08.2022, the reason for cancellation of candidature of petitioner was "No Objection Certificate not signed by the HOO, i.e. Group CDR, NSG." On 18.08.2022, the list of eligible candidates was displayed where name of the petitioner was not present. Thereafter, the petitioner made representation to the Inspector General, Frontier Headquarter, Odisha and Bengaluru on 20.08.2022 and thereafter to Director General, Border Security Force (hereinafter referred as 'BSF') on 22.08.2022.
6. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that the parent department of the petitioner is BSF, however, the petitioner is presently working on deputation as Training Incharge Commando in National Security Guard (hereinafter referred to as 'NSG'), Mumbai and the petitioner applied through proper channel i.e., his parent department, therefore, NSG has nothing to do with the No Objection Certificate. Thus, the candidature of petitioner has been incorrectly cancelled.
7. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that the petitioner is maintaining outstanding ACR, therefore, there is no occasion for either BSF or for NSG to not to issue No Objection Certificate to petitioner to participate in abovesaid examination to be held on 28.08.2022.
8. Learned counsel for respondents, who appeared on advance notice, submits that since the petitioner is on deputation with the NSG, Mumbai, therefore, No Objection Certificate is required to be issued from the said department.
9. In view of the fact that the petitioner is an Inspector in BSF, however, is presently working in NSG, Mumbai, had applied for the aforesaid examination pursuant to advertisement dated 22.04.2022 for the post of Assistant Commandant/GD and forwarded by respondent No. 2, we hereby, in the interest of justice, direct both the respondents No.2 and 4 to issue "No Objection Certificate" to the petitioner by 05:00 pm tomorrow, i.e. 26.08.2022, if found otherwise eligible. The certificate so issued shall be sent to respondent No.3-SSB on the same day, who is the Nodal Agency for conducting the examination in question. On receipt of said certificate(s), the respondent No.3-SSB is directed to issue admit card within two hours of the receipt of the same to allow the petitioner to participate in the LDCE 2018-2022 to be held on 28.08.2022 and communicate it to the petitioner via e-mail i.e. ronrakhathing813@gmail.com and upload the same on the official website of the respondent no.3.
10. It is made clear that if there is any material against the petitioner which does not allow the responde
AI
The court mandated the issuance of No Objection Certificate for a deputed employee to participate in an examination, advocating for candidates' rights and proper administrative procedures.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a decision by the competent authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings, and the importance of vigilance clearance in the co....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the requirement of the advertisement did not stipulate that the Caste Certificate and the Domicile Certificate had to be from the same regi....
Administrative authorities are bound by existing notifications granting relaxations for the production of mandatory recruitment documents. Denying such policy-based benefits to a candidate, thereby c....
The main legal point established is that there was no absolute obligation on the respondent to communicate through both email and phone number, and fair opportunities were given to the petitioner for....
Validity of the petitioner's computer course certificate and the timeliness of her representation submission.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.