SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJEEV NARULA
Monu Khan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. eligibility criteria for jee based on category. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments for petitioner's inclusion in ews category. (Para 8 , 9)
3. court's considerations and implications of category change. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. lack of entitlement for category modification. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
5. correction policy and responsibilities of candidates. (Para 18 , 19)
6. judgments cited by petitioner are not applicable. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
7. final decision to dismiss the petition. (Para 24 , 25)

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Narula, J. (Oral):

C.M.(APPL)......../2022 (for filing additional documents)

1. A copy of an application for filing additional documents has been handed over across the board.

2. Registry is directed to number the application.

3. Considering the grounds stated therein as well as the documents annexed, the same is allowed. Let the additional documents be taken on record.

4. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 12213/2022 & C.M. APPL. 36615/2022 (for interim stay)

5. The Petitioner - Monu Khan, an aspirant of B.Tech. course, appeared in the Joint Entrance Examination (Main) 2022 ["JEE (Main)"] under the `General/(UR)' Category. He has not qua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top