SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAJMI WAZIRI, VIKAS MAHAJAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Incom Cables (Pvt.) Ltd. – Respondent


Table of Content
1. condonation of delay requirements for appeal (Para 1 , 2)
2. interpretation of 'sufficient cause' in delay applications (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. assessment of reasons provided for delay (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. dismissal of appeal due to time-barred status (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Najmi Wazri, J. (ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode (physical and virtual hearing).

CM APPL. 31424/2022 (For condonation of delay)

1. This application seeks condonation of a delay of 34 days in the filing of the accompanying appeal under section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against the order of the District Judge dismissing its petition under section 34 of the Act. The appeal has also been filed under section 13 (1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The latter provision reads inter alia as under:

    " Section 13. Appeals from decrees of Commercial Courts and Commercial Divisions. (1A) Any person aggrieved by the judgment or order of a Commercial Court at the level of District Judge exercising original civil jurisdiction or, as the case may be, Commercial Division of a High Court may appeal to the Commercial Appellate Division of that High Court within a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top