SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Best Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
New Delhi Municipal Council – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed to challenge bid rejection. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of bid processes and evaluations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. arguments on unequal treatment of bidders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. court's views on judicial restraint in contract evaluations. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. determination of unfair treatment of the petitioner. (Para 22 , 23 , 24)
6. court orders fresh submission of documents. (Para 25 , 26)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. Being agrieved by the Order/Minutes of Meeting dated 10.03.2022 whereby the Technical Evaluation Committee of the Respondent herein refused to scrutinize and consider technical bid of the Petitioner which had been submitted in response to the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) No.05/EE (Spl. Project)/AB/2021-2022 issued by the Office of the Executive Engineer (Special Project), Civil Engineering Department of the Respondent, the instant petition has been filed by the Petitioner.

2. The instant petition has been filed with a prayer to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the Order/Minutes of Meeting dated 10.03.2022 by which the Technical Evaluation Committee of the Respondent has refused to cons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top