SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Leela Mathur – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the property and water issues. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 12)
2. arguments by appellant regarding damage and negligence by mcd. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
3. court's observations on mcd's negligence and waterlogging. (Para 27 , 29 , 30)
4. legal principle regarding compensation for violation of fundamental rights. (Para 35 , 38)
5. final conclusion on compensation enhancement and dismissal of mcd's appeal. (Para 42 , 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J. This Court has before it two cross Letters Patents Appeals emanating from the Impugned Judgment dated 12.02.2020 ("Impugned Judgment"), passed by the Ld. Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 8098/2010. The first of these appeals i.e. LPA No. 48/2021 has been filed by Smt. Leela Mathur seeking, inter alia, an enhancement of the cost of Rs.3 lakhs imposed upon the Municipal Corporation of Delhi ("MCD") vide the Impugned Judgment. The other appeal i.e. LPA No. 161/2021, has been preferred by the MCD seeking setting aside of the compensation/costs of Rs.3 lakhs imposed upon it.

2. The facts of the appeals before us are that Smt. Leela Mathur presently resides at House No.98, West Azad Nagar, Shahdara, Sout

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top