Scouts and Guides for Animals and Birds vs Union of India

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Scouts and Guides for Animals and Birds – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petitioner's aim for animal welfare. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. contestation regarding transportation cruelty. (Para 3 , 5)
3. regulatory framework for animal transport. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 11)
4. compliance with transport regulations mandated. (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
5. court's directive for ensuring regulatory adherence. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J. The petitioner before this Court - a Registered Trust, has filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and is represented by Mr. Naresh Kadyan, who is its Founder Member. The Trust aims in social work working deeply towards animal welfare and other causes in favour of society at large.

2. The petitioner Trust has filed the present writ petition alleging transportation of camels into the State of Delhi from Rajasthan in violation of the statutory provisions as contained under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The petitioner has stated that every year during the Independence Day Parade, large number of camels are transported in goods carrier subjecting them to cruelty and the petitioner has submitted various representatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADScouts and Guides for Animals and Birds – AppellantVersusUnion of India – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Scouts and Guides for Animals and Birds – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent