DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Ambika Kapur – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenges assessment order under income tax act. (Para 1) |
| 2. dispute over the filing of income return and related transactions. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's analysis on the obligations of the assessing officer. (Para 6) |
| 4. order for remand and fresh assessment by assessing officer. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral):
1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 21st April, 2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act') along with notice dated 21st April, 2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act for the assessment year 2018-19 and proceedings initiated pursuant thereto.
2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Respondent initiated the proceedings under Section 148A of the Act on the basis of an incorrect assumption of fact that the petitioner had not filed her return of income and hence income to the tune of Rs.30,57,78,545/-in relation to financial transactions entered by the Petitioner during the year, had escaped assessment.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner filed a detailed reply dated 14th April, 2022, wherein the Petitioner explained to the Re
A petitioner can challenge proceedings based on incorrect factual assumptions about income tax return filings, and the Assessing Officer must respond appropriately to rebuttals presented.
Orders based on vague allegations without specific details violate the right to a fair hearing under tax law.
Administrative orders can be set aside by courts if found to be flawed in execution, ensuring rectification of inaccuracies in legal processes.
The court emphasized the importance of providing all necessary annexures and directed the Petitioner to re-supply its reply with annexures to the Assessing Officer within a week, in accordance with t....
Natural justice is violated when a party is not given a chance to explain their case before adverse decisions are made in tax reassessment processes.
Court emphasized that reassessment notices must consider all disclosures made by the taxpayer, reaffirming the principle of natural justice when reviewing prior returns.
The Assessing Officer must consider the reply of the Assessee before issuing an order under Section 148A(d), failing which it violates natural justice.
The court determined that the reopening of assessment under Section 148A was unwarranted as the case fell under Section 153C due to insufficient adherence to procedural requirements.
Reassessing without a hearing contravenes natural justice principles; proceedings must ensure opportunities for taxpayer representation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.