SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Pradeep Kumar Varshney – Appellant
Versus
Income Tax Officer – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenge to notice issued under section 148a (Para 1)
2. arguments on applicability of section 153c (Para 2 , 4)
3. court's observations on procedural validity under section 148a (Para 3 , 5)
4. impugned order is untenable; remand for fresh order (Para 6)
5. disposal of writ petition and pending applications (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

1. Present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 9th April, 2022 passed by the Respondent under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short `Act') for the Assessment Year 2018-19 and all consequential proceedings in pursuance thereto including issuance of the notice dated 9th April, 2022 under Section 148 of the Act.

2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that in the present case notice under Section 148A is not warranted as it is a case of Section 153C of the Act to which proviso (c) of Section 148A applies. 

3. Mr. Sunil Agarwal, learned counsel for the Respondent has brought on record the instructions received by him by way of email dated 13th May, 2022. The said email is reproduced as under:

    "To,

    Sh. Sunil Aggarwal Senior Standing Counsel, High Court 4th Floor, 15 Link Road, Jang

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top