SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
Reliance General Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Anila Rajeev – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant's appeal against compensation awarded. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding deductions in compensation. (Para 3 , 4)
3. rebuttal concerning merging of compensation heads. (Para 5 , 9)
4. legal standards for conventional heads of compensation. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. modification of compensation awarded. (Para 10 , 11)
6. final order and direction of the court. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Gaurang Kanth, J. The present appeal has been preferred by the Appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the Award dated 30.11.2003 passed in MACT No. 328/2012 by the Court of learned Presiding Officer, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "Impugned Award").

2. By way of the impugned Award dated 30.11.2003 the learned Tribunal Awarded a compensation of Rs.22,55,832/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition i.e. 09.07.2012 till realization and held that the Insurance Company is liable for payment of the awarded compensation to the claimants.

3. Ms. Prerna Mehta learned counsel for the Appellant restricted her arguments with regard to reduction of quantum of compensation

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top