Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Priya Khosla – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Khosla – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural history of the suit. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. subsequent proceedings and challenges. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. laches and delay in filing the petition. (Para 15 , 16 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. limitations of the high court’s article 227 jurisdiction. (Para 23 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. criteria for interference under article 227. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 33) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India assails order dated 13th May 2013 passed by the learned Joint Registrar of this Court in CS (OS) 1478/2011, which was the earlier avatar of the suit instituted by the respondent against various defendants of which the petitioners were Defendants 9 and 10. Consequent to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction of District Courts, the suit was transferred to the Court of the learned Additional District Judge ("the learned ADJ") and renumbered CS DJ 10027/2016.
Facts
The first impugned order - dated 13th May 2013
2. At the time when the suit was pending before this Court as CS (OS) 1478/2011, the learned Joint Registrar in this Court, vide
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
