SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Mansi Jain – Appellant
Versus
Abhinav Jain – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, assails the following order dated 03rd March, 2022, passed by the learned Additional District Judge ("the learned ADJ"), in CSDJ No. 6668/2018:

CSDJ No. 6668/18

Mansi Jain vs. Abhinav Jain

    03.03.2022

    Present: Ms. Manju Jain, Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff.

    Defendant in person.

    An application u/o IX Rule 7 R/w Section 114 and 151 CPC has been moved by defendant for setting aside the ex-parte order dated 30.11.2021 and review of the order passed by the court on aforesaid date.

    Defendant no.1 Sh. Abhinav Jain, also happens to be an Advocate, states that due to pandemic conditions he could not pay the cost, though, the WS was filed on record. Ld. Counsel for the plaintiff states that the defendant is taking all steps for delaying the matter.

    The court has considered the rival arguments. The present suit is suit for Possession/Damages and Mesne Profit which was filed on 21.12.2018. Opportunity has been granted repeatedly to the defendant and cost was imposed. Though, as such no ground for recall order is made out however keeping in view the pandemic condition, the WS being filed on record and fact that de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top