SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani – Respondent


JUDGMENT

I.A. 8515/2022

1. By this application, filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, `CPC'), the plaintiff prays for an ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant no. 1, its directors, executives, partners or proprietors, officers, servants and agents or any other persons acting for or on their behalf from manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, exporting, advertising, marketing and/or in any manner using, directly or indirectly, in relation to any jewellery/precious stones/gems and/or any other allied and cognate goods/services, including but not limited to textiles, textile goods and fabrics, under the impugned marks/labels/logos/domain name `VASUNDHRA'/ and/or `VASUNDHRA FASHION'//https://vasundhra.business'site and/or any other mark identical and/or deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trade marks/labels/logos/domain name `VASUNDHRA'/`VASUNDHRA JEWELLERS'/, the `VASUNDHRA' family of marks (hereinafter referred to as the `VASUNDHRA Marks')/https://vasundhrajewellers.com/ or doing any other thing amounting to infringement of the plaintiff's registered `VASUNDHRA Marks' as also amounting to passing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top