SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIBHU BAKHRU, AMIT MAHAJAN
Vasundhra Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kirat Vinodbhai Jadvani – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. Vasundhra Jewellers Private Limited (hereafter `the appellant') has filed the present appeal impugning a judgment dated 21.09.2022 (hereafter `the impugned judgment') passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the appellant's application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereafter `the CPC') was dismissed.

2. Respondent no. 1 carries on business in textiles and garments. The appellant had sought interim orders, inter alia, restraining respondent no.1 from using the trademark "VASUNDHRA FASHION/", in connection with its business, claiming that the use of the said mark infringes its trademarks and amounts to passing off. The said interim relief was rejected and this has led the appellant to file the present appeal.

Factual Context

3. The appellant states that it was incorporated on 28.10.1999 and thereafter, it adopted the mark "VASUNDHRA/VASUNDHRA JEWELLERS" to commence the business of "jewellery in precious metals and gems". It operates one showroom at Pitampura in Delhi. It further states that it has been using the said name extensively, continuously and uninterruptedly. Therefore, the said marks have acquired imme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top