MS Dreams Lingerie Products vs Akash Chawdhary

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
MS Dreams Lingerie Products – Appellant
Versus
Akash Chawdhary – Respondent

Table of Content
1. plaintiff claims well-known trademark status. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defendant argues against deceptive similarity. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. plaintiff highlights partner's non-interest in trademark. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. plaintiff refutes defendant's claims based on prior business. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. court rejects defendant's request to vacate injunction. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
6. court emphasizes the importance of overall impression in trademark cases. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31)
7. court concludes marks are deceptively similar, rightfully favoring plaintiff. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
8. court confirms injunction and concludes the order. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)

JUDGMENT

I.A. 8665/2022 & 11026/2022

1. By this order, this Court shall be disposing of the above two applications; the first filed by the plaintiff, being IA No. 8665 of 2022, under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, `the CPC'); the second filed by the defendant, being IA No. 11026 of 2022, under Order XXXIX Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the CPC.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plain