Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Jeps Pharma Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Office of Comissioner of Industries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property lease and cancellation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments regarding lease violation and cancellation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. court's analysis of the applications of law regarding the lease. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 4. evaluation of the appellate court's decision. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 5. final ruling and dismissal of the petition. (Para 56 , 57 , 58) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant civil writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing and setting aside of order dated 6th June 2003, passed under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "PP Act") passed by the Estate Officer concerned, as well as of order dated 30th October 2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "Appellate Court") in PPA No. 3/08/03.
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The following course of events have led to filing on the instant petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
