Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Premier Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
Office of Commissioner of Industries – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of lease and eviction procedure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's claim against eviction order. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. respondents' defense against claims. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 4. petitioner's procedural objections on appeal. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. court's jurisdiction on appeal. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. boundaries of writ jurisdiction. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 7. findings regarding lease violation. (Para 36 , 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 8. appellate findings on eviction order. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. conclusion and dismissal of the petition. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. The instant civil writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing and setting aside of order dated 13TH February 2003, passed under Section 5(1) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as "PP Act") passed by the Estate Officer concerned, as well as of order dated 30th October 2009 passed by the learned District Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "Appellate Court")
High Courts' jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 requires proving gross illegality or irregularity for intervention; cancellation of lease upheld based on violations of lease conditions.
Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is limited to reviewing the legality of process rather than re-evaluating facts. Eviction upheld for breaches of lease conditions.
The High Court's writ jurisdiction is limited to examining errors apparent on the record, not to reassess facts or evidence in eviction cases under the Public Premises Act.
The eviction under the Public Premises Act was upheld as lawful, with sufficient notice and adherence to due process, and claims of bias against the Estate Officer were rejected.
The court emphasized the significance of upholding the terms of the Lease Deed, the impact of termination of the Lease Deed, and the applicability of the Conversion Scheme in determining the rejectio....
Point of Law : Document sought to be brought on record have been obtained by the appellant under Right to Information Act only in 2019.
A decision is vitiated by irrationality if the decision is so outrageous, that it is in defiance of all logic; when no person acting reasonably could possibly have taken the decision, having regard t....
The court emphasized the importance of upholding lease terms and the inapplicability of conversion schemes to terminated leases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
