Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Prithvi Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case regarding the incident (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the status of deceased's passenger rights (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. identification of legal questions raised (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. findings on the bonafide passenger status (Para 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 5. understanding of untoward incidents under the railways act (Para 15 , 17) |
| 6. assessment of liability and negligence in context of the act (Para 18 , 19) |
| 7. conclusion and order regarding the appeal (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. The appellants have preferred the present appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against order dated 18.01.2022 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi in Claim Application No. OA/II/u/DLI/5/2021, whereby the claim petition preferred by the appellant/claimants was dismissed.
2. Facts of the case, as summarised in the impugned order, are extracted below:
"Shri Prithvi Singh and Smt Bala Kanwar, being parents of Bhupender Singh, have filed the present claim application praying that for the death of their son in an untoward incident on 14th April 2019 between KM 34/37 Garhi Harsaru and Gurgaon railway stations, compensation be awarded. T
A passenger retains bonafide status despite traveling beyond their ticket destination, and falling from a train constitutes an untoward incident entitling compensation under the Railways Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the definition of a bonafide passenger and untoward incident under the Railways Act, 1989, and the application of the princip....
The incident of falling under a moving train constituted an untoward incident, entitling the appellants to compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act.
Mere absence of ticket does not negate bonafide passenger status; affidavit suffices to discharge burden. Falling from running train is untoward incident under no-fault liability, entitling dependent....
Compensation claims under the Railways Act for untoward incidents require proving bona fide passenger status; absence of valid tickets and unauthorized track presence negate claims.
The absence of a ticket does not negate the claim of a deceased being a bona fide passenger under the Railways Act, 1989.
Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 imposes strict liability on Railways for deaths from untoward incidents, with no requirement for proving negligence or production of a ticket to establish bona ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
