Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
Vijay Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Parvesh Kumar Gupta – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding pre-institution mediation (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's analysis of urgent interim relief criteria (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. scope of article 227 jurisdiction (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition (Para 33) |
JUDGMENT
1. The order dated 12th September 2022, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Courts) ("the learned Commercial Court") in CS (Comm) 36/2022 (Parvesh Kumar Gupta v. Vijay Mahajan), under challenge in the present petition instituted under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, rejects an application filed by the petitioner, as the defendant in the suit, seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC).
CS (Comm) 36/2022, in pricis
2. The respondent claimed in CS (Comm) 36/2022 ("the suit", hereinafter) to be the owner of G-16A, Ground Floor, Kalkaji, New Delhi-110019 ("the suit property"). He claimed ownership on the basis of a Relinquishment Deed dated 12th May 2015 executed by several persons including the petitioner, as the defenda
The requirement for pre-institution mediation under Section 12-A(1) of the Commercial Courts Act can be bypassed if the suit seeks urgent interim relief, despite previous orders maintaining status qu....
A single co-owner can initiate eviction proceedings against a tenant without the consent of other co-owners based on agency principles, supporting the maintainability of such petitions.
The court clarified that the definition of a commercial dispute requires exclusive commercial use, limiting the scope of Article 227's supervisory jurisdiction to jurisdictional errors rather than me....
All amendments necessary for determining the real issue in controversy between the parties must be allowed, and the fact that the amendment may be belated cannot be a ground to disallow the amendment....
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is maintainable against non-appealable orders of Commercial Courts despite restrictions in the Commercial Courts Act, preserving the High Cou....
Against an order dismissing an application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement, neither an appeal nor revision petition under Section 115 of the CPC lies.
The definition of 'status quo' in legal terms encompasses both possession and user of property; alterations to this status trigger violation of court orders under Article 227.
The rights of the tenants and the protection of the suit premises were crucial in influencing the court's decision to maintain status quo.
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable if the conditions for appeal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 are not met, emphasizing the need to adhere....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
