SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
S.K. Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Mahika Sharma – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petition filed to quash maintenance orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner claims undue financial burden and judicial bias. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. challenge to family court's dismissal of review and evidence considerations. (Para 8 , 9 , 14)
4. discussion on financial means and responsibilities of both parties. (Para 15 , 16 , 19 , 25)
5. court affirms financial obligations and evidentiary support. (Para 18 , 60)
6. upheld maintenance order; pension attachment aspects clarified. (Para 70)
7. correction of a procedural error in prior orders. (Para 71 , 72 , 74)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J. The present petition has been filed with the following prayers:

    "In the premises mentioned above, this Hon'ble Court:

    (A) Be graciously pleased and kind to quash and set aside the orders dated 10 Aug 2021 and 04 Aug 2021 passed by Ld Principal Judge Sh Praveen Kumar, Ld. Family Court South, Saket, New Delhi in maintenance case being M.No.108 of 2012 (Mahika Sharma & Anr. vs. Sunil Kumar Sharma) u/s 125 Cr.P.C.

    (B) Pass such order(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in facts and circumstances of the case and in the interests of justice."

2. The present criminal revision pet

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top