SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Bhopal Singh – Appellant
Versus
Urmila Devi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.:

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 assailing the impugned order/judgment dated 21.01.2008, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in HMA case No.215/2006. Learned Trial Court, vide the impugned order, has dismissed the petition for dissolution of the marriage filed on the ground of adultery and cruelty.

2. The facts in brief, as alleged by the appellant/husband are that the marriage between the appellant/husband and respondent No.1/wife was solemnized in the month of April/May 1975 at District Meerut, (U.P.) in accordance with the Hindu Customs and Ceremonies. The marriage was duly consummated and three children were born to the parties, who are now major. The appellant/husband was employed with Delhi Jal Board and was allotted government accommodation. The appellant/husband has alleged that respondent No.1/wife never cared for the appellant/husband and his parents. The respondent wife neglected to fulfil marital obligations and spoiled the matrimonial relations of the parties.

3. The appellant/husband has alleged that respondent No.1/wife left the matrimonial home when the you

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top