Back
S. TALAPATRA, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Anil Kumar Tripathy – Appellant
Versus
Biva Upadhyay (Tripathy) – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J. - This is an appeal from the judgment and order dated 03.02.2017 delivered in Title Suit (Divorce) 02 of 2015 by the Additional District Judge, Kamalpur dissolving the marriage between the appellant and his wife.
2. The wife instituted the suit for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce on solitary ground viz., cruelty contemplated under section 13(1)(ia) of the HINDU MARRIAGE ACT , 1955. According to the wife (respondent herein), her marriage with the appellant was solemnized on 18.06.2006 as per Hindu rites and customs and thereafter she started conjugal life with the appellant in his residence at Bhubrighat in Karimganj District of Assam. After the marriage, appellant started demanding dowry from her for which a matrimonial discord developed between them. However, in the midst of difference, a daughter was born to them on 11.08.2007. The appellant was still creating pressure on his wife for bringing dowry and sometimes he had tortured her physically even in presence of his parents. Being irritated by the conduct of her husband, wife left her matrimonial home. After few years, they reconciled at the intervention of well wishers and the wife
The court affirmed that the evidence of persistent cruelty justified the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, establishing a clear breakdown of the marital relat....
Cruelty as a ground for divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act requires substantial proof, which was not established in this case.
Mental cruelty, as defined under Hindu Marriage Act, can irreparably damage the trust and respect in marriage, providing sufficient grounds for divorce even without physical violence.
The court found that allegations of cruelty must be substantiated with corroborative evidence, and in this case, the appellant failed to prove such claims, leading to the dismissal of the divorce sui....
The husband's claims of cruelty were insufficient to establish grounds for divorce, leading the court to grant judicial separation instead, recognizing the potential for reconciliation.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the concept of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the consideration of irretrievable b....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
